Comparison · Scope 1 & 2 vs Scope 3

Scope 1 vs Scope 2 vs Scope 3

Scope 1 is direct emissions from what you own; Scope 2 is indirect emissions from purchased energy; Scope 3 is every other value-chain emission you cause but don't directly control.

The short answer

Scope 1 and 2 are the emissions a company controls directly or via purchased energy. Scope 3 is everything else in the value chain — typically 70–90% of the total.

Side by side

DimensionScope 1 & 2Scope 3
BoundaryOwned / controlled operations + purchased energy15 upstream & downstream categories
DataPrimary meter, invoice and fleet dataSupplier data, activity data or spend-based factors
ControlHigh — direct operational leversIndirect — requires supplier / customer engagement
ReportingMandatory under ESRS E1, IFRS S2Mandatory for material categories
Typical share10–30% of total70–90% of total
When to use Scope 1 & 2

Focus operational emissions programmes (efficiency, electrification, PPAs) on Scope 1 & 2 first — they are directly controllable.

When to use Scope 3

Structure the long-term decarbonisation plan around Scope 3: supplier engagement, product design and financed-emissions strategy.

Frequently asked questions

Do we have to report Scope 3?+

Under ESRS E1 you must screen all 15 categories and report the material ones. Under SBTi, Scope 3 targets are required where those emissions are material.

What's the difference between location- and market-based Scope 2?+

Location-based uses grid-average emission factors. Market-based reflects contractual choices — PPAs, green tariffs, GOs. Dual reporting is required.