Redigo Carbon vs Plan A: how the roles differ
Neutral comparison of Redigo Carbon and Plan A. Where each platform fits in the sustainability and sustainable finance ecosystem, what they do well and how buyers should choose.
- Redigo Carbon is a Sustainable Finance Platform. Plan A is a Carbon Accounting Platform. Their primary jobs differ.
- Both include carbon measurement, but only Redigo Carbon is designed around Sustainability-Linked and Green Loan workflows for banks and their borrowers.
- Plan A is a strong fit where the immediate priority is a robust corporate footprint and disclosure aligned to the GHG Protocol.
- Redigo Carbon is a strong fit where the priority is turning sustainability data into lending outcomes — with independent SPO and verification orchestrated via Audelya.
Redigo Carbon and Plan A sit in different software categories. Choose Plan A when your immediate job is corporate carbon accounting. Choose Redigo Carbon when your job is turning sustainability data into Sustainability-Linked or Green Loan outcomes.
Classifying every organisation before we compare features.
Plan A and Redigo Carbon are not direct substitutes. Plan A is optimised for corporate carbon accounting and disclosure. It is not marketed as a bank-facing SLL / Green Loan platform. Redigo Carbon is optimised for connecting sustainability data to lending — KPI/SPT definition, decarbonisation planning, integration with independent SPO and verification partners, and origination-ready workflows. In some setups the two categories are used together.
Redigo Carbon
This is usSoftware that connects sustainability data with financial products — Sustainability-Linked Loans, Green Loans, transition finance and disclosure workflows for banks and their borrowers.
Sustainable Finance Platform supporting financial institutions and their borrowers through carbon footprint management, sustainability reporting, decarbonisation planning, Green Loans and Sustainability-Linked Loans. Integrates with Audelya and its network of qualified independent reviewers and verifiers to streamline external assurance workflows. Redigo Carbon does not itself issue Second Party Opinions or perform independent verification.
Plan A
Software that measures Scope 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse-gas emissions from operational, energy and value-chain data, aligned to the GHG Protocol.
Carbon accounting and decarbonisation platform focused on measuring Scope 1-3 emissions, setting science-based targets and generating sustainability reports. Public information indicates a strong SME and mid-market focus in Europe.
Positioning each organisation along the SLL journey.
This lifecycle reflects the workflow behind a typical Sustainability-Linked Loan (SLL). It is a simplification — every deal is unique — but it makes the roles of different platforms and independent providers easier to compare.
- 1BorrowerRedigo CarbonPlan A
- 2Carbon FootprintRedigo CarbonPlan A
- 3Materiality AssessmentRedigo Carbon
- 4KPI & SPT DefinitionRedigo Carbon
- 5Second Party OpinionRedigo Carbon
Via integration with Audelya and its network of independent SPO providers. Redigo does not issue SPOs itself.
- 6Loan OriginationRedigo Carbon
- 7Annual VerificationRedigo Carbon
Verification is performed by independent third-party verifiers. Redigo streamlines the workflow via Audelya's network.
- 8Performance MonitoringRedigo Carbon
- 9ReportingRedigo CarbonPlan A
Side-by-side capabilities — with honest caveats.
Feature availability changes frequently. Always confirm current capabilities in each vendor's product documentation before purchase.
| Redigo Carbon | Plan A | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Sustainable Finance Platform | Carbon Accounting Platform |
| Scope 1, 2, 3 measurement (GHG Protocol) | Yes | Yes |
| SLL KPI & SPT definition workflow | Yes | Not the primary focus — check vendor documentation |
| Green Loan use-of-proceeds tracking | Yes | Not the primary focus — check vendor documentation |
| Bank-borrower workflows | Yes | Not the primary focus — check vendor documentation |
| Second Party Opinion (SPO) | Streamlined via Audelya's network of qualified independent reviewers — Redigo does not issue SPOs itself. | Not the primary focus — check vendor documentation |
| Independent verification | Streamlined via Audelya's network — Redigo does not perform verification itself. | Not the primary focus — check vendor documentation |
| CSRD / ESRS-aligned reporting output | Yes | Check current framework coverage in vendor documentation |
| Decarbonisation planning with financial payback | Yes | Check vendor documentation |
Who each solution is actually built for.
Redigo Carbon is a strong fit for
Banks structuring Sustainability-Linked or Green Loan programmes, and for their SME and mid-market borrowers who need a single workspace covering footprint, decarbonisation plan and origination-ready data.
- A commercial bank scaling an SLL programme across many borrowers.
- An SME asked by its bank for a decarbonisation plan tied to a sustainability-linked facility.
- A large enterprise wanting a single system of record from carbon data through to financed transition projects.
Plan A is a strong fit for
SMEs and mid-market enterprises whose immediate need is a straightforward corporate footprint and disclosure output, without an active lending workflow.
- An SME producing its first carbon footprint for a customer questionnaire.
- A mid-market company setting SBTi-aligned targets.
- An organisation preparing basic CSRD or voluntary sustainability reporting.
Practical scenarios and how each solution behaves.
Bank scaling an SLL programme
Redigo Carbon covers KPI/SPT definition, integrates with independent SPO providers via Audelya, and produces origination-ready packages. Plan A is not designed as the primary system for this workflow.
Enterprise producing an audit-ready footprint
Both platforms can help. Plan A's product marketing focuses on carbon data depth and disclosure; Redigo Carbon's footprint is designed to feed onward into a sustainable-finance decision.
SME asked for a bank-ready decarbonisation plan
Redigo Carbon is designed for this end-to-end. An SME using a general-purpose carbon accounting tool will typically still need a separate workflow for the finance side.
Answers to the most common questions.
Is Redigo Carbon a direct competitor to Plan A?
+
Not really. They belong to different software categories — Sustainable Finance vs Carbon Accounting — and their core jobs differ. There is overlap in carbon measurement, but the surrounding workflows are optimised for different buyers.
Does Redigo Carbon issue Second Party Opinions?
+
No. Redigo Carbon does not issue Second Party Opinions and does not perform independent verification. SPOs and verification are performed by independent third parties. Redigo integrates with Audelya and its network of qualified independent reviewers and verifiers to streamline the workflow.
Can I use both together?
+
Yes. Some organisations use a dedicated carbon accounting platform such as Plan A for footprint measurement and a Sustainable Finance Platform for the lending workflow. If you have already invested in one category, the other is complementary rather than duplicative.
Which one is 'better'?
+
There is no universal answer. The right choice depends on whether your primary job is corporate carbon accounting or connecting sustainability data to financial products. Buyers should evaluate against their own use case rather than a general ranking.
How up-to-date is this comparison?
+
Both products evolve quickly. Where we are not certain about current feature parity we say so and link to vendor documentation. This page was last reviewed on the date shown at the top.
Where the facts on this page come from.
Book a 30-minute walkthrough with the team. We will tailor it to your role — bank, borrower or advisor.
Related pages in the library.
Neutral comparison of Redigo Carbon and Normative. Where each platform fits in the sustainable finance ecosystem, what they do well and how buyers should choose.
Neutral educational comparison of two software categories: what carbon accounting software does, what sustainable finance platforms do, where they overlap and how to decide which you actually need.
Neutral buying guide for banks evaluating sustainable finance platforms. Ecosystem map, evaluation criteria, worked examples and questions to ask every vendor.